Torture, whoever carries it out, degrades the values we uphold

Sean ONeill: explanation & , : {}

Britains comprehension and security services are admant that they do not practise, acquit or spin a blind eye to torture.

They get irritable about any thought that this is not the case, with Jonathan Evans, head of MI5, banishment off a singular and irritable essay to the press usually last week.

But the direct for a full and straightforward exploration in to the claims of complicity in detainee ill diagnosis is fast apropos irresistible.

Mr Evans has certified that the Security Service was delayed to acknowledge changes in US process that authorised a range of violent techniques to be used.

Related LinksUK called to comment over woe allegationsTell the law about torture, watchdog insistsMI5 investigated over uninformed woe claims

But the thought that the comprehension services mistakes were the outcome of naivety is difficult to sustain. Who can dont think about those images from Guantánamo Bay of al-Qaeda detainees hooded and shackled? The Americans expelled the cinema to show how difficult they were rebuilt to be in the War On Terror. But they frightened people and soured magnetism for the US.

It is stretching credit to disagree that, carrying seen those promotion pictures, Britain did not think there was something really controversial about the approach the majority critical fan was treating apprehension suspects.

The counter-terrorism agencies have a improved argument: 9/11 altered their universe in an instant. MI5, the made at home comprehension service, was half the stream distance and had to change the concentration from Irish republican terrorism to al-Qaeda.

Mr Evans pronounced last year: Our comprehension resources were not competent to the incident we faced and the base of the militant complaint was in tools of the universe where the standards and practices of the internal security equipment were really far private from the own.

In alternative words, to find out anything and all we could about al-Qaeda, Britain had to do commercial operation with regimes with abominable human rights records.

Mr Evans went on to contend that it would have been a desertion of avocation if MI5 had not worked with abroad agencies to acquire report that saved British lives.

In the duration from 2001 to 2005, the vigour was consistent vigour and the counter-terrorism agencies could usually strike the crocodiles nearest the boat.

Perhaps it has already been forgotten, but those years saw one apprehension tract after an additional ricin, unwashed bombs, fertilizer bombs, 7/7 and 21/7.

Today the bargain of al-Qaeda is most improved and the quarrel opposite it has been carried serve upstream aiming to interrupt plots prior to they get close to fruition.

There is small doubt, however, that any good subsequent from woe (no make a difference who carried it out) is short-lived. Life-saving comprehension might have been gleaned, but woe degrades the values we are ostensible to defend and acts as a recruiting representative for the terrorists.

In Northern Ireland in the 1970s Britain used waterboarding opposite IRA prisoners and interned hundreds of people but trial. The outcome was to widen a dispute that was in conclusion finished by the make use of of techniques such as notice and dialogue.