Monday, July 19, 2010

The BBC"s self-made problems Steve Hewlett Comment is free

It"s easy to boot yesterday"s BBC plan examination as a tactical reply to short-term domestic conditions. Close a integrate of digital air wave stations, revoke outlay on sports rights and programme acquisitions, sell off BBC magazines and scale behind web pages. These measures damp most of the some-more outspoken of the corporation"s critics, and is hopefully sufficient to relieve the politicians.

There is of march something in all that. The timing of the plan examination has no disbelief been shabby by politics, and a small in the industry will take a small joy from the BBC"s proposals.

But there is most some-more here than initial meets the eye. For a start, this is the initial time ever that the BBC has willingly since up anything. More significantly, it unequivocally does vigilance the finish of twenty years of digital expansion.

It is value remembering that it was the supervision of the day – swayed by John Birt and the BBC – that gave the house the purpose of heading the republic in to the digital multichannel destiny – and a looseness price enlarge to match. Thus BBC3 and BBC4 were innate – along with News 24, CBeebies and CBBC. Subsequently, the BBC was since the purpose of heading the assign in to digital air wave – the grand switch to DAB. Hence the presentation of so most some-more BBC air wave stations.

The supervision longed for digital switchover for the own purposes but the BBC took up the plea with gusto, desiring it faced intensity irrelevance if it didn"t fool around a big piece in the new inform environment. Throw in a 15-year sip of digital panic, that saw the BBC looking to colonize and carry out each new service, height and digital creation in the idea that it would lose salience between looseness payers who would group to alternative services if the BBC wasn"t there.

Yesterday"s inform throws an engaging light on those last twenty years. Indeed, you can see the roots of most of the BBC"s stream travails – that it looks as well big and acts as well competitively, with small caring for the marketplace stroke on nascent or struggling blurb players – in the large enlargement of BBC services that occurred. Worse, the inform additionally cites the deleterious outcome a small of the new digital multichannel services have had on the BBC"s core proposition.

Take for e.g. BBC2. The inform says the BBC "will reinstate the channel"s repute as the home of desirous drama, humerous entertainment and significant programming". But BBC2 usually lost the repute for humerous entertainment when the short was eliminated (originally with the budget) to newly combined BBC3. Similarly, the repute for culture, humanities and higher-end significant programming additionally took a hit as BBC Four came on the scene. The new channels – for all the great things they came to do – had widely separated the BBC"s mainstream offering. What"s more, consumers didn"t handle utterly as approaching – they blending to new digital choices but abandoning most of their old equivalent term preferences.

In a sense, what the BBC is right away perplexing to do is to leapfrog from the "multichannel" proviso in to the on-demand future. It needs to refocus on the core propositions – a small carnivorous of resources in the expostulate to digital enlargement – and make use of them to shape metal a key on all sides in the rising universe of on-demand smoothness of calm on the internet. Ask them to concede on that, and the BBC would rather die in a ditch.

0 comments:

Post a Comment